Glossary • Marketing & Business Leadership
By Mark Gabrielli · Fractional CMO & COO · Last updated: May 2026A fractional CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) is a senior marketing executive who works with a company on a part-time, embedded basis - typically 8 to 25 hours per week on a monthly retainer, scaling with the size of the marketing function. They own the full marketing function: strategy, team management, budget allocation, and revenue accountability.
A fractional CMO is a part-time Chief Marketing Officer who provides full executive-level marketing leadership -- strategy, team management, and revenue accountability -- on a monthly retainer that typically runs $4,000 to $25,000 per month depending on company stage, without the $280,000 to $450,000 annual cost of a full-time hire. The fractional model gives growth-stage companies ($1M to $20M revenue) access to CMO-level go-to-market strategy, demand generation architecture, and pipeline ownership without equity dilution or long-term employment commitment.
The term fractional refers to the engagement model, not the level of commitment or seniority. A fractional CMO brings the same strategic depth and executive authority as a full-time CMO - applied at a fraction of the cost.
Unlike a marketing consultant who delivers recommendations, a fractional CMO executes. They sit in leadership meetings, manage the marketing team, own the budget, and are accountable to pipeline and revenue outcomes.
A fractional CMO is a part-time Chief Marketing Officer who provides full executive-level marketing leadership - strategy, team management, and revenue accountability - on a monthly retainer, without the full-time cost.
Ready to stop guessing on marketing?
Get your free game plan →Free, no obligation. If it's a fit, you'll pick a time to talk with Mark directly.The fractional CMO model exists because the full-time seat turns over faster than the work it owns. Spencer Stuart's CMO Tenure study, published in January 2026 and covering 346 named chief marketing officers at S&P 500 companies as of 30 June 2025, puts average CMO tenure at 4.1 years against 5.0 years for all C-suite roles at the same companies. Close to a third of the index, 31%, no longer staffs an enterprise CMO at all. Those two numbers, not a cost argument, are the honest case for fractional marketing leadership.
| What was measured | Figure | What the study reports | What it means for the hiring decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average CMO tenure, S&P 500 | 4.1 years | The shortest average tenure of any core role in the S&P 500 C-suite except one. | The seat turns over roughly every four years even at companies with the deepest benches. Continuity of marketing judgment is a separate problem from filling the seat. |
| Average tenure, all S&P 500 C-suite roles | 5.0 years | The benchmark the CMO number is measured against. | A CMO leaves about eleven months sooner than the average peer executive. That gap is the whole argument, and it is smaller than the usual telling of it. |
| Chief operating officer tenure | 3.3 years | The one core role that turns over faster than the CMO. | Useful as a check on the story. If short tenure proved the marketing function was uniquely broken, the COO number would not exist. |
| Consumer-sector CMO tenure | 3.5 years | The shortest sector figure reported. | Sector matters more than the headline average. A consumer brand should plan for turnover in the seat; a slower-cycle B2B company has more room to hire long. |
| Healthcare CMO tenure | 3.9 years | Reported alongside the consumer figure. | Even the steadier sectors sit under the four-year mark, which is short relative to the time a repositioning or a category entry takes to pay back. |
| S&P 500 companies with no enterprise CMO | 31% | Close to a third of the index does not staff marketing leadership as a single enterprise role at all. | This is the load-bearing figure. The largest companies in the country are already distributing the job across other titles. A smaller company doing the same thing with fractional leadership is following the pattern, not inventing one. |
| Departing CMOs at a new company within six months | 77% | Most exits are followed quickly by another senior role. | Turnover here is mostly mobility, not dismissal. Read a short stint on a resume as a market fact before reading it as a performance signal. |
| CMOs moving into a similar or larger role | 62% | The destination of the majority of departures. | The role is a stepping stone as often as it is a landing spot. That is a reason to fix continuity structurally rather than to hunt for someone who will stay. |
| CMOs moving into a CEO role | 9% | A further 13% move into a divisional CEO, president or COO role. | About one departing CMO in five moves up rather than sideways, which is what makes the retention problem hard to solve with money. |
| CMOs who were first-time CMOs | 73% | Reported alongside 62% promoted from within. | Most people holding the title are doing the job for the first time. Years carrying a CMO title and years of judgment about a specific problem are not the same measurement. |
The number is routinely used to prove something it does not prove. "CMOs last four years" is usually offered as evidence that the role is impossible, that boards are impatient, or that marketing cannot demonstrate value. The same study undercuts that reading with its own data: 62% of departing CMOs move into a similar or larger role, 9% become chief executives, another 13% take a divisional CEO, president or COO seat, and 77% are at a new company inside six months. That is a pattern of mobility, not a pattern of failure. If you are reading a short stint on a marketing leader's resume, the base rate says ask where they went before you assume why they left.
What the data does establish is narrower and more useful. The seat is the least stable senior seat in the building, and it is unstable for structural reasons that a better hire does not fix. A brand repositioning, a category entry, a channel rebuild or a pricing change is a two- to four-year arc. A tenure of 4.1 years means the person who starts that arc is, on the average case, unlikely to be the person who finishes it. The problem a company is actually solving is continuity of senior marketing judgment, and hiring one full-time executive is only one of the available answers to it. The 31% of the S&P 500 running without an enterprise CMO are answering it a different way.
One caveat that matters more than the headline. This is S&P 500 data. A 30-person B2B software company is not a smaller version of an index constituent, and the 4.1-year figure does not transfer to it. What transfers is the structural observation, and it lands harder at small scale: a large company that loses its CMO still has a director bench, a research function, an agency roster and a documented plan. A small company that loses its one senior marketer usually loses the strategy with them, because the strategy was never written down anywhere else. That is the case for treating documented, transferable marketing leadership as the deliverable, whether the person delivering it is full-time, fractional, or an interim hire. It is also why the full-time comparison below is a question about structure and risk, not only about monthly cost.
Source: Spencer Stuart, "CMO Tenure 2026: Snapshot of an Expanding Role for Marketing Leaders", published January 2026. Sample: 346 named chief marketing officers at S&P 500 companies, measured as of 30 June 2025. Figures verified against the published study on 2 September 2026. Where a figure on this page carries an "as of" date, that date says when the underlying data was sourced; the review date says when the page was last checked against it.
A full-time CMO costs $280,000-$420,000 per year including salary, benefits, and equity. A fractional CMO costs $3,000-$15,000 per month, providing the same strategic leadership at 20-40% of the cost.
The right choice depends on company stage. Companies under $15M ARR rarely have enough work - or budget - to justify a full-time CMO. A fractional CMO delivers executive leadership while preserving capital.
Full comparison: Fractional CMO vs. Full-Time CMO →
A fractional CMO is not one fixed arrangement. The role is structured to fit the company, and the structure decides the cost, the cadence, and how much the CMO owns. As of July 2026, these are the four engagement models companies most often use.
| Engagement model | How it works | Typical duration | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly retainer | A fixed monthly fee for a set number of days or hours per week leading marketing and the team | Ongoing, usually 6 to 18 months | Companies that need steady CMO leadership run week to week |
| Project or sprint | A scoped engagement to deliver one outcome, such as a rebrand, a launch, or a go-to-market rebuild | 6 to 16 weeks | A defined initiative with a clear finish line |
| Advisory or part-time | A few hours a month coaching the founder or a junior marketing lead on strategy and priorities | Ongoing, lighter touch | Early teams that have a doer but need senior direction |
| Interim or embedded | Near-full-time coverage to hold the CMO seat during a gap or a fast scale-up | 3 to 9 months | Bridging a CMO departure before a full-time hire |
Cost ranges by company stage are in the fractional CMO cost benchmark. Model choice is a framework, not a rule; the right structure depends on your stage and goals.
The typical trigger points for hiring a fractional CMO:
Fractional CMO retainers range from $2,500 to $15,000 per month depending on scope and hours. Most engagements run $4,000-$10,000/month. There are no benefits, equity dilution, or recruiter fees.
Fractional CMO cost benchmark, as of July 2026 (market ranges by company stage):
| Company Stage | Monthly Retainer | Hours / Week | vs. Full-Time CMO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed to Series A | $4,000 - $8,000 | 8-12 hrs | ~20-25% of cost |
| Under $10M revenue | $8,000 - $15,000 | 10-15 hrs | ~30-45% of cost |
| $10M - $30M revenue | $15,000 - $25,000 | 20-25 hrs | ~40-55% of cost |
| Hourly / project (any stage) | $200 - $500 / hr | Variable | Project-scoped |
A full-time CMO typically costs $200,000 to $350,000 per year in base salary plus bonus, equity, and benefits. A fractional CMO delivers the same executive leadership at 40-70% less, with measurable impact usually inside 30 to 60 days.
The confusion about fractional CMO scope comes from comparing the role to marketing consultants or agency partners. A fractional CMO is an embedded executive -- they own the function, not a project.
A fractional CMO owns the full marketing function: ICP definition, positioning, messaging architecture, channel strategy, team direction, budget allocation, vendor management, agency oversight, and revenue attribution. They report to the CEO and are accountable to the same metrics a full-time CMO would be: pipeline generated, CAC, MQL-to-SQL conversion, and revenue influenced by marketing.
The distinction matters because companies often confuse "getting marketing help" with "getting CMO leadership." A marketing consultant delivers a strategy deck. A marketing agency runs campaigns. A fractional CMO builds the architecture that determines whether either of those investments work.
Three of the most common options for companies that need marketing leadership but aren't ready for a full-time C-suite hire:
| Fractional CMO | Marketing Agency | Marketing Consultant | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Output | Revenue and pipeline outcomes | Campaign execution and deliverables | Strategy recommendations |
| Team Management | Yes -- manages team and vendors | No -- client manages the agency | No -- advises, doesn't manage |
| Revenue Accountability | Owns pipeline and CAC metrics | Impressions, clicks, leads delivered | Deliverable completion |
| Typical Cost | $4K - $25K/month | $5K - $30K/month | $5K - $25K/project |
| Best For | Companies needing CMO leadership without full-time cost | Companies with clear strategy needing execution | Specific project-based strategy needs |
Fractional CMOs are most common in B2B companies, growth-stage startups, and regulated industries where marketing complexity outpaces the company's ability to hire a full-time CMO. The most active industries include:
Not all fractional CMOs have the same background or capability. Before hiring, evaluate candidates across five dimensions:
A fractional CMO engagement structured correctly follows a consistent 90-day architecture regardless of industry or company stage:
Days 1-30 (Diagnostic): Full audit of current marketing performance, ICP definition, attribution model assessment, team capability review, channel analysis, and competitive positioning. No campaigns should launch before this phase completes.
Days 31-60 (Architecture): Build the strategic layer -- GTM architecture, channel mix selection, messaging framework, demand generation system design, CRM configuration, and revenue attribution model. Every execution decision in phase three flows from this foundation.
Days 61-90 (Activation): Launch the first campaigns based on the new architecture. Initial pipeline metrics begin flowing. Team is trained on the new playbook. Attribution dashboards are live. First board-ready marketing report is delivered.
Companies that skip the diagnostic phase -- going straight to campaign execution -- consistently generate lower-quality pipeline at higher CAC because the ICP and channel selection haven't been validated.
Full guide: The First 90 Days of a Fractional CMO →
A fractional CMO is engaged as an independent contractor and paid on a Form 1099, not through payroll. That label is not self-executing. Two different federal tests decide the question, they are applied by two different agencies for two different purposes, and neither one is bound by what your contract calls the relationship. As of September 2026 the wage and hour test is the six-factor economic reality test at 29 CFR part 795, and the tax test is the IRS common law control test. A properly run fractional engagement passes both comfortably. The exposure is not the model. It is drift.
This matters at the moment of hiring, not later, because the facts that decide it are the ones you set up on day one: how many clients the CMO carries, who supplies the tools, whether there is an end date, and whether anyone is told what hours to work. Nobody renegotiates those after a notice arrives.
| The test | Who applies it | What it governs | The standard | What a wrong answer costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic reality test | US Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, under the Fair Labor Standards Act | Minimum wage, overtime and recordkeeping | Six factors weighed as a totality of the circumstances under 29 CFR 795.110. The rule states that no one factor or subset of factors is necessarily dispositive, and that the six factors are not exhaustive | Back pay and unpaid overtime, plus liquidated damages. Usually the smaller exposure for an executive role, for the reason set out below |
| Common law control test | Internal Revenue Service | Federal employment taxes and income tax withholding | Facts showing the degree of control and independence, grouped into three categories: behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship | Unpaid withholding, the employer share of FICA, and penalties under Internal Revenue Code section 3509. This is where a wrong answer usually costs real money |
The Department of Labor's rule lists six factors and is explicit that they are weighed together. The regulation states that no one factor or subset of factors is necessarily dispositive and that these six factors are not exhaustive. That matters here, because a fractional CMO reliably loses one of the six and still lands clearly on the contractor side of the other five.
| Factor (29 CFR 795.110(b)) | What the regulation asks | A genuine fractional engagement | What turns it toward employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill | Whether the worker's own managerial skill, initiative and business judgment affect their economic success or failure | The CMO sets their own rates, decides how many clients to carry, and absorbs the cost of a bad month or an unpaid invoice | A fixed monthly sum that cannot go up or down whatever the CMO does, with no other clients and no ability to take any |
| Investments by the worker and the potential employer | Whether the worker makes capital or entrepreneurial investments in their own business | Own entity, own laptop, own analytics and outreach stack, own insurance, own brand and marketing spend to win the next client | The company supplies every tool, every seat licence and the hardware, and the CMO invests nothing beyond time |
| Degree of permanence of the work relationship | Whether the relationship is indefinite and exclusive, or definite, project based or sporadic | A defined term with a stated end or renewal point, run alongside other concurrent clients | An open-ended arrangement with no end date and no other clients, which is indefinite and exclusive in everything but name |
| Nature and degree of control | Who sets the schedule, supervises the work, limits the ability to work for others, and controls prices or the terms of the sale | The CMO decides how the strategy gets built and when the work happens, and is judged on the outcome | Set hours, a required daily standup, an approval gate on method rather than result, and a clause restricting other clients |
| Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer's business | Whether the work is critical, necessary or central to the employer's principal business | This one usually points toward employee and it is honest to say so. Marketing leadership at a company that sells through marketing is close to the core | Nothing needs to turn it. Expect to lose this factor and win on the other five, which is exactly what a totality test is for |
| Skill and initiative | Whether the worker uses specialised skills together with business initiative, or depends on the employer for training | A CMO brought in precisely because the company does not have the skill, who needs no training to do the work | A role the company trains someone into, which is close to the definition of a junior hire |
The fifth factor is the one worth being honest about. Marketing leadership at a company that sells through marketing is close to the core of the business, so the integral-part factor tends to point toward employee no matter how the engagement is written. That is not a defect in the arrangement. It is what a totality test is designed to absorb, and it is also the reason a checklist that treats any single factor as decisive gives the wrong answer.
The Department of Labor decides whether someone is owed overtime. The IRS decides whether you should have been withholding tax. They are separate questions with separate tests, and an engagement can be comfortable under one and awkward under the other. The IRS groups the evidence into three categories.
| Category | What the IRS asks | The practical marker |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral control | Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job? | Instructions on method, required hours or location, and training are all evidence of control. Asking for a quarterly plan is not. Dictating how it is written is |
| Financial control | Are the business aspects of the worker's job controlled by the payer, including how the worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, and who provides tools and supplies | Invoicing against a contract, unreimbursed business expenses, own tooling, and the ability to seek other work all point to contractor |
| Type of relationship | Are there written contracts or employee type benefits such as a pension plan, insurance or vacation pay, will the relationship continue, and is the work a key aspect of the business | Benefits are the giveaway. The moment a fractional CMO is on the health plan or accruing paid time off, the paperwork says contractor and the facts say employee |
The consequence is set out plainly in the IRS guidance. A business that classifies an employee as an independent contractor with no reasonable basis for doing so may be held liable for employment taxes for that worker, under Internal Revenue Code section 3509. Relief provisions may apply where there was a reasonable basis and all required federal information returns were filed consistently, but the IRS states that relief does not determine a worker to be an independent contractor. It relieves the tax bill without settling the status. If either side wants the status settled, either the business or the worker can file Form SS-8 and ask the IRS to determine it, and the IRS cautions that it may take at least six months to receive a determination.
The analysis in force is the 2024 final rule, published at 89 FR 1638 and effective 11 March 2024, which is the six-factor totality test in Table 6. On 27 February 2026 the Department of Labor published a proposed rule at 91 FR 9932 to rescind that analysis and replace it with the one the Department adopted on 7 January 2021, and to apply the same analysis to the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act as well. Comments closed on 28 April 2026.
The 2021 analysis is not simply an older version of the same thing. It designates two of the factors, the nature and degree of control over the work and the individual's opportunity for profit or loss, as core factors that, in the Department's words, typically carry greater weight in the analysis than any other factor. Where both point the same way, the Department's position is that there is a substantial likelihood that is the individual's accurate classification.
Read against Table 6, that would help a genuine fractional CMO rather than hurt them. The two factors that would carry the weight are the two a real fractional engagement wins most clearly, and the factor a fractional CMO reliably loses, whether the work is integral to the business, would stop being able to drag the answer. As of September 2026 none of this has taken effect. No final rule has followed the February proposal, so the six-factor test is what governs today and is what you should structure against.
Anyone selling classification anxiety to justify a hiring decision is overselling it. A fractional CMO with several concurrent clients, their own entity, their own tools, a fixed monthly fee and no set hours is the paradigm independent contractor under either test, and the analysis is not difficult. Most companies asking this question already have the right answer and want confirmation.
Two things sharpen it. First, the wage and hour exposure is smaller than it sounds. The Fair Labor Standards Act mainly buys minimum wage and overtime, and a marketing executive would in most cases sit inside the executive or administrative exemption, so even an adverse finding often produces no overtime owed. Those thresholds moved this year: federal courts vacated the Department's 2024 exemption rule, and on 15 May 2026 the Department removed that text from the Code of Federal Regulations and republished the prior text at 91 FR 27833, restoring the salary level to $684 per week, or $35,568 per year, with the highly compensated employee threshold at $107,432 per year. The tax side carries no such exemption, which is why the IRS test is the one to structure against.
Second, the risk is created by drift rather than by the model. The engagements that get reclassified are the ones that quietly became something else: one client instead of several, forty hours instead of eight, direct reports, a seat on the org chart, no end date. If a fractional engagement is heading there, the right response is to convert it deliberately to a full-time hire, not to keep the invoice format and hope. The paperwork is not the thing being tested. The working relationship is.
A fractional CMO is engaged as an independent contractor and paid on a Form 1099, not through payroll. That label is not self-executing. Two separate federal tests decide it: the Department of Labor's six-factor economic reality test at 29 CFR part 795, which governs minimum wage and overtime, and the IRS common law control test, which governs employment taxes and withholding. Neither is bound by what the contract calls the relationship. A properly structured fractional engagement, with several concurrent clients and no set hours, passes both.
Yes, and the tax side is usually the expensive one. The IRS states that a business which classifies an employee as an independent contractor with no reasonable basis for doing so may be held liable for employment taxes for that worker, with the amounts set by Internal Revenue Code section 3509. Relief may be available where there is a reasonable basis and all required information returns were filed consistently, but the IRS is explicit that relief does not determine a worker to be an independent contractor. It only relieves the tax liability.
A fractional CMO should not be on the benefits plan and should not accrue paid time off. The IRS lists employee type benefits such as a pension plan, insurance or vacation pay as evidence of an employment relationship under the type of relationship category. A company email address is a smaller signal and is often granted for practical access reasons, but benefits are the one to refuse. The paperwork saying contractor does not survive facts that say employee.
It is proposed to change and has not changed yet. The analysis in force is the 2024 final rule at 89 FR 1638, effective 11 March 2024, which weighs six factors as a totality of the circumstances. On 27 February 2026 the Department of Labor published a proposed rule at 91 FR 9932 to rescind that analysis and replace it with the one it adopted on 7 January 2021, which treats control and opportunity for profit or loss as core factors carrying greater weight, and to extend the same analysis to the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. Comments closed on 28 April 2026. As of September 2026 no final rule has followed, so the six-factor test still governs.
Often not, which is why the wage and hour exposure is usually smaller than the tax exposure. The Fair Labor Standards Act mainly buys minimum wage and overtime, and a marketing executive would in most cases fall within the executive or administrative exemption. Those thresholds moved recently: federal courts vacated the Department's 2024 exemption rule, and on 15 May 2026 the Department removed that text from the Code of Federal Regulations and republished the prior text at 91 FR 27833, restoring the salary level to $684 per week, or $35,568 per year, with the highly compensated employee threshold at $107,432 per year.
Drift, not the model itself. An engagement that starts at one day a week and ends up at forty hours for a single client, with direct reports, set hours, company-supplied tools, no other clients and no end date, is an employee wearing a different word, and every factor in both tests will read it that way. If either side wants certainty, either the business or the worker can file Form SS-8 and ask the IRS to determine the status formally, though the IRS warns it may take at least six months to receive a determination.
Fractional CMOs typically work in four models. A monthly retainer is a fixed fee for a set number of days or hours per week leading marketing, usually 6 to 18 months. A project or sprint engagement is scoped to one outcome such as a rebrand or launch over 6 to 16 weeks. An advisory or part-time model is a few hours a month coaching the founder or a junior lead. An interim or embedded model is near-full-time coverage to hold the CMO seat during a gap or scale-up, usually 3 to 9 months.
Yes, the terms are used interchangeably. Fractional emphasizes the engagement model - a fraction of the cost and time - while part-time describes the hours. Both refer to a senior CMO working on retainer rather than as a full-time employee.
Most fractional CMO engagements run 8 to 25 hours per week, which is roughly 35 to 110 hours per month. Light advisory work can be a few hours a month. Full function ownership with team management sits at the top of that range, typically 20 to 25 hours per week.
Yes. A true fractional CMO manages the marketing team, agencies, and vendors -- not just advises. This is a key differentiator from a marketing consultant or advisor.
A marketing consultant delivers recommendations and strategy documents, then the client implements. A fractional CMO owns the function -- managing the team, the budget, the agencies, and the KPIs. A consultant advises. A fractional CMO leads.
Most fractional CMO engagements are primarily remote, with periodic in-person meetings for key strategy sessions or board meetings. Remote delivery is effective for strategy, team management, and campaign oversight. Modern B2B marketing leadership does not require physical presence to be effective.
Most fractional CMO engagements run 6-18 months. The first 90 days build the architecture and activate the demand generation system. Most clients continue past 90 days because the pipeline compounds -- each month produces more pipeline than the last as the system matures. Month-to-month structures allow clients to scale up, scale down, or exit without penalty.
Typical outcomes measured at the 90-day mark: 20-40% improvement in CAC, consistent qualified pipeline generation, improved MQL-to-SQL conversion, and a functioning revenue attribution model. Specific results depend on the starting point -- companies with zero pipeline can reach $1M+ in qualified pipeline within 90 days when the GTM architecture is built correctly from day one.
Results measured in pipeline generated, CAC reduced, and revenue compounded -- not reports delivered or hours billed.
"A fractional CMO is not a marketing consultant who delivers recommendations. It is an operating executive who owns the commercial strategy, manages the team, holds the pipeline number, and is accountable to the board for revenue growth from marketing. That accountability distinction changes what gets built and how fast it gets built. We had $1.4M in qualified pipeline in 90 days.",
"The fractional model exists because most companies at our stage need CMO-level strategy more than they need a full-time marketing presence. Two days a week of senior operator judgment directed at the right problems outperforms five days a week of execution without strategic direction. Our marketing function went from cost center to commercial engine in one quarter.",
"We defined a fractional CMO the wrong way for two years -- we thought it meant part-time marketing management. The right definition is full strategic ownership of the commercial function on a fractional time commitment. When we understood that, we understood why the ROI was so compelling: CMO-level commercial outcomes at 20% of full-time CMO cost.",
B2B SaaS companies need a fractional CMO once they have product-market fit and must scale pipeline predictably, usually between 2 and 50 million dollars in revenue. MarkCMO installs the demand engine, the funnel metrics, and the reporting SaaS investors expect, for 5,000 to 15,000 dollars per month instead of a full-time hire.
Reviewed by Mark Gabrielli, Fractional CMO and COO. Last verified July 2026.
Book a free 30-minute strategy call with Mark Gabrielli or call 321-917-5738. You will get a straight diagnosis and the one or two things to fix first, whether or not we work together.
A fractional CMO is a senior marketing executive who owns your marketing strategy, team, and number on a part-time basis instead of a full-time salary. MarkCMO installs the demand engine and the reporting a board expects for companies between 1 million and 100 million dollars in revenue, at 5,000 to 15,000 dollars per month.
Reviewed by Mark Gabrielli, Fractional CMO and COO. Last verified July 2026.
Book a free 30-minute strategy call with Mark Gabrielli or call 321-917-5738. You will get a straight diagnosis and the one or two things to fix first, whether or not we work together.
Book a free 30-minute call with Mark. You will walk away with a clear, honest diagnosis and the one or two things to fix first, whether or not we work together.
Book a free strategy call →Every MarkCMO engagement is structured to protect you. You stay because the results are compounding -- not because you are locked in. Cancel any time. No fees, no questions.
Free Strategy Call
No pitch. No deck. A direct 30-minute conversation about your biggest commercial challenge and exactly what to do about it.
Mark Gabrielli is a Fractional CMO and COO serving B2B companies in healthcare, SaaS, fintech, and beyond. Results in 30 days.
Work With Mark →Record a short video and pitch me your business. If it makes sense, I help you scale 1-on-1, a $10-20K/mo value, for free.
Apply to The Scale Room →